Do they want less work on the front end to make the colors right, and are they pretty much hitting their exposure right on the money? C1 might be the way to go. Perhaps that is because C1 attempts to show a more finished file.Īll in all, the results are close enough that each individual will have to prioritize what's most important to them in their workflow.
In Lightroom's defense, though, there seemed to be a splotchy quality in the out of focus areas in C1 past three stops of recovery. Lightroom fared better in the color fidelity from shot to shot throughout recovery however, the details were a touch muddier as the abuse got worse and worse. The general trend seems to be that C1 retains more detail throughout the entire spectrum, but I did see that there was a noticeable color shift as the exposure was brought back. This lens is stupidly sharp at f/5.6, so any issues should be the fault of software.įirst, both Capture One and Lightroom at correct exposure:įirst off, I think both processors did a fine job pulling the exposure back, considering the abuse.
Capture one fuji software#
The ideal exposure was shot on my Fujifilm X-Pro 2 with my Fujinon 50-140mm f/2.8 at f/5.6 to ensure any sharpness issues would be a result of the software and not the lens. The methodology for this test was to underexpose images to various degrees, then bring back the exposure to match an "ideal" exposure according to my Sekonic L-358 light meter. This model is known for a fiery attitude and curves in all the right places. I brought out one of the hottest commodities in the biz at the moment. There seems to be a bit more detail apparent in the C1 file, but nothing that a little tweaking in Lightroom couldn't bring back as well. There doesn't appear to be the smearing that was present in old Lightroom versions with X-Trans files.įor the next test, I wanted to use a model. Lightroom brings more of a washed out look to the photo, which is typical of unprocessed raw files. Right off the bat, it's obvious that Capture One seems more "finished" than Lightroom. On the left is Capture One Lightroom is on the right: The Capture One version is Capture One 9.1.1.įirst up is ideal lighting. I took a well-exposed photo of musician Ryan Chrys, shot on my old Fujilm X-T1, imported the file into both Lightroom and Capture One, cropped, and set up a side-by-side comparison. For all of these photos, the Lightroom version was Lightroom CC 2015.5. I decided on testing the two factors that were the most important to me: output when I nail the lighting (ideal conditions) and output when I screw up the lighting (not so ideal). What I wanted to compare here, however, was how the programs handled X-Trans files right out of the gate. But, what to test?
Of course, each of these apps have noise reduction, color correction, and every other algorithm imaginable to tweak your photos to your heart's content. I'd rather do side-by-side comparisons and see if there are any glaring differences between the outputs of the two pieces of software at default settings.
Capture one fuji professional#
Live View + Xtrans to DNG not supportedįujifilm/Pro required for tethering.As I'm not a professional software reviewer by trade, I had no intention of throwing up a bunch of charts, graphs, doo-hickeys, and gizmos to make my assessment. Xtrans to DNG not supportedįujifilm/Pro required for tethering + Live Viewįujifilm/Pro required for tethering. Follow the link below for a quick guide on support for cameras, lenses, and files, there you will also find a list of cameras that we are working on offering support and the approximate dates:Ĭamera, lens, and RAW Support Quick Guideįujifilm/Pro required for tethering + Live View.